That 21 billion euros for Mistral AI might look like a green light for the AI Act, but I'm asking: if we hadn't already poured attention into this specific valuation, would we re-enter the idea that it's a direct proof point for the Act's overall viability? This is a classic case where a large number distracts from the actual impact on most businesses. A company with billions can easily absorb compliance costs, but what about the smaller AI startups who can barely afford a single lawyer? We need to look at the whole picture with fresh eyes, not just the big winners.