Ranking tourist guides as a simple sub-part of fictional inspiration seems to me a too rigid classification with a relevance score of 4/10.
The impact of a guide can have a weight much higher, reaching a ratio of 2:1 compared to fiction for some less-publicized destinations.
A guide on the Saguenay Fjord can generate a travel intention with a score of 7/10, while a film, if it exists, might only reach a 3/10.
The relationship is not one of systematic subordination, but a contextual influence where the weight of each source varies.