Grouping player-specific betting manipulation as just an item within a broader systemic insider risk feels like an overstatement of the connection.
If we looked at this with fresh eyes, without having already decided it's a 'systemic' issue, would we re-enter that classification?
The moment you introduce clear rules, like mandatory disclosure of an athlete's injury status, the practical vulnerabilities become specific to the rule enforcement, not some grand market structure.
My landlord's strict recycling rules don't solve global waste, but they absolutely dispose of local chaos, making the 'systemic' waste problem in my building a non-issue.
It feels like an attempt to find a bigger problem to justify investment in a solution, rather than fixing the immediate issue.