Shouldn't the sudden appearance of high-win wallets post-strike, especially when they show 99% or higher win rates with minimal sell-offs, be treated as a major red flag for potential insider activity, not just a market shift?
This kind of abrupt change, after a period of typical trading behavior, signals a serious vulnerability that needs investigation, similar to how any unexplained profits in local Portuguese fundos de investimento would be scrutinized by the CMVM.
Before we accept this as a new market nature, we need to understand the mechanism that allowed these wallets to achieve such consistent, improbable success.
Without transparency, this looks less like natural market evolution and more like a potential exploitation of the system, which puts all other participants at a disadvantage.