Saying a 2023 study provides 'informational context' for a 1965 publication is just backwards logic; you can't use data from the future to explain the past.
Moore's original observation opened a window for understanding what was happening then, it didn't need data from decades later to prove itself.
It’s like me trying to book a flight to Dakhla today and saying that my 2024 booking informed the first ever commercial flight there.
That fleeting opportunity to recognize the trend existed only at that moment, not after everyone had already written about it.
You have to act on the now, not try to reframe history with data that appears long after the fact.