How can one company's valuation, no matter how significant, serve as the primary informational context for judging an entire regulatory framework like the AI Act? Historically, evaluating the viability of such broad regulations has always required extensive, long-term legal and economic analyses, not just a snapshot of a single company's fundraising success. For instance, new business rules here in Japan are debated for years with input from countless industries before they're considered sound; the playbook has long been about comprehensive review. This kind of narrow focus risks a drawdown if market conditions shift or other companies face different compliance costs that weren't considered, like finding your favorite sushi place closed for good because they couldn't afford a new health code update.