How does a CFO's general statement about fund allocation map directly to a precise, multi-year infrastructure deployment plan with targets like 200 MW and 1 GW? That's like saying a broad budget line item for "office supplies" gives you the exact SKU count for every pen and paper clip; it's a 2 out of 10 for direct influence, not an 8.
Such specific figures depend on engineering specifications and load ratios, not just a financial intention.
For instance, if a server farm needs 500kW, the financial statement just covers the cost, not the detailed power draw per rack unit.
There are too many technical variables between a budget and an operational plan for the relationship to be so strong.