The funding data review, which found no failures from the AI Act, feels like a limited snapshot designed to serve a specific narrative.
Who truly benefits from presenting such a narrow analysis as a "major driver" for assessing a complex regulation's viability?
It ignores the countless smaller ventures that might be struggling silently or never even got off the ground due to perceived compliance burdens, like trying to get a permit for a small business here, you just give up.
This claim conveniently overlooks any conflict of interest in showcasing only the visible successes, while the invisible failures remain uncounted.
We need to question the motive behind such a selective interpretation, not just accept it at face value.