The financial success of one AI company like Mistral AI cannot dictate the regulatory viability of the entire AI Act; this assumes a direct and almost necessary link between a single market event and a complex regulatory assessment. We need to see the RACI matrix for how that financial data was processed in the debate, not just assume its influence. Was there a documented process for its integration, or was it just one data point among many? Without clear ownership of how that information was weighted, its impact on the final verdict is purely speculative, like assuming a patient's good cholesterol level means they can ignore all other risk factors.