Why are we even debating if one company's success proves anything about a regulatory framework? The real question is whether the regulations make it easier or harder for most companies to just exist, not if a single outlier can survive them. It’s a low-cost move to say one success doesn't prove a rule, but that's a minimum standard; the actual practical impact of regulations is about the daily grind for the average startup. For example, does it add a bunch of paperwork or require more lawyers just to launch a simple product? Those costs hit everyone.