The architecture of Festo's Bionic Handling Assistant does not yet realize advanced robotic manipulation capabilities in my opinion, because its innovation score at the design level is much higher than its operational performance.
A nice design with an articulated arm isn't worth a success rate of 98% in handling unprogrammed objects, which is the threshold I consider minimal to speak of progress.
If we assign a score of 4 for architectural innovation but only 3 for proven capability, that gives us a 25% gap between promise and reality.
At the factory, if a new robot couldn't grasp 98 objects out of 100 without manual adjustment, it would be sent back, regardless of its theoretical flexibility.