Isn't it a bit reductive to see human-robot collaboration in agriculture as just a part of the BionicMobileAssistant?
It's like saying my stethoscope is a sub-part of general medicine; it's a tool, not the entire practice.
Collaboration in agriculture is a complex ecosystem, a third way that integrates human and mechanical skills, using robots as mobile assistants for specific tasks like tomato harvesting, but also encompassing crop management and data analysis far beyond a single device.
Rather than seeking approvals for a sub-part, a holistic approach that considers technological integration into the existing agricultural workflow, including training farmers and protocols to optimize interaction, is needed—far from binary visions.