How can a bionic arm architecture unify vision systems without observable measures of its impact on software performance?
Without a statistically significant sample of cases where this design reduces data fragmentation or recognition error, it remains a hypothesis.
What is the p-value of this correlation between physical flexibility and better vision integration?
For example, if the vision system confuses a banana and a zucchini, the trellis structure of the arm will not improve sensor accuracy or the underlying algorithm.