The assertion that the architecture of a robotic arm like the Festo Bionic Handling Assistant reduces fragmentation of robotic vision systems seems to me a hasty generalization, because it ignores software integration challenges. Fragmentation often concerns communication standards and data formats between sensors and algorithms. A flexible arm improves physical dexterity, not necessarily data consistency or software interoperability. For example, if the camera on the arm sends data in an incompatible format with the recognition software, fragmentation persists despite mechanical flexibility.