Although the BionicMobileAssistant can incorporate an arm, claiming it as a broader category than the Festo Bionic Handling Assistant is a classification that does not account for the scores of functional autonomy of each component.
The Festo arm, with its biomimetic precision, can have an efficiency value of 80% in delicate manipulation, even if the mobile robot only reaches a 60% availability score.
The relationship is more of a partnership than a strict hierarchy, where the performance of the arm alone can be superior to the entire system if the mobile platform fails 20% of the time.
The degree of value of each module should rather guide the classification, rather than simple inclusion.
For example, if the mobile system breaks down, the Festo arm, if on a stable platform, could still accomplish 90% of its precision tasks.