So, is this hierarchy really stable? My probability that local events are a component always present and always significant in destination validation is low, say 20%.
I update my assessment downward because this relationship is conditional, not universal, and heavily depends on the type of traveler.
A business traveler, for example, has a 90% probability of ignoring local events if their schedule is fixed, making the impact of these events secondary.
However, if going to a family wedding, the event is the destination, and its relevance is 100%, but it’s not the same type of validation.
Therefore, the assertion that their impact is always significant does not account for varied travel objectives.