A survey of 78 responses cannot serve as a basis for conclusions with such precision on travelers' identity document verification habits.
To reach the peak of relevance, we need to rely on data that has a full expression of the population.
Claiming that 75% of people act in a certain way based on such a limited sample creates an asymmetry between conclusion and evidence.
Imagine if Dutch bus schedules were based on the habits of only 78 people; it would be chaos.
To truly understand these dynamics, a large-scale study is needed, not a Google Forms survey.