The claim that comparative analysis of travel applications influenced subsequent surveys lacks tangible evidence of a clear process. Where are the minutes of meetings or validation reports detailing how the conclusions of the benchmark were integrated into the questionnaire design? For influence to be established, a decision chain must be documented, showing, for example, formal approval of the survey plan based on these results. Without a clear RACI or sign-off on the methodology, we cannot assert a direct causality; it might just be a thematic coincidence. For example, if the questionnaire was finalized before the benchmark was even reviewed, the influence would logically be null.