The idea that a comparative analysis directly influenced the design of a Google Forms survey is very optimistic without a clear validation process.
Who gave the sign-off for the analysis conclusions to be integrated into the survey questions?
Without a traceability document of decisions, a simple influence link is an unproven assertion; it's like saying today's rain is due to yesterday's weather without a synoptic chart.
A formal deliberation or a memo showing how the analysis results were translated into specific objectives for the 78-response questionnaire would be necessary.
A RACI (Responsible, Approve, Consult, Inform) for this decision would be a much more robust proof.