Simply tracking model growth from 63 to 668 doesn't automatically mean that information seamlessly populates a dataset or directly causes this expansion; it implies a finite resource conversion that just isn't there.
It's like recording every patient's fever in a file – that's data, yes, but it doesn't automatically cure them or ensure we have the medicine budget to treat them all.
There are always so many other factors, like the actual system capacity or the dwindling availability of specialists.
The connection between tracking and direct expansion is far too simplistic; it suggests an automatic flow of information into actionable growth, which isn't how things work when resources are so scarce.