It's a straightforward failure mode to suggest a 2023 study could possibly inform a 1965 publication; the chronological order just doesn't work that way. Moore's Law describes trends that allowed things like storage costs to plummet later, not the other way around. The blast radius of such a backward causal claim undermines the integrity of historical analysis itself.
This is like saying the success of ChatGPT in 2024 informed Alan Turing's original papers on computability in the 1930s.