2.Bloc 1 - Fundamental ConceptEasy· Upstream DNA transport
In river ecosystems, what phenomenon is responsible for up to 30% of eDNA detections, potentially leading to false positives and inflated species richness?
3.Bloc 1 - Fundamental ConceptEasy· Keratinized outer layers
Which biological characteristic primarily limits the effectiveness of eDNA surveys for detecting reptiles and large mammals compared to amphibians or fish?
4.Bloc 2 - Academic TheoryMedium· Sequential Detection Gate Model
Under the Sequential Detection Gate Model, which final analytical step must succeed to prevent a false negative after successful shedding, transport, and amplification?
Based on the Exponential Amplification Principle, how does PCR theoretically neutralize the initial discrepancy in DNA deposition across different taxa to enable detection?
According to the Differential Shedding Hypothesis, why do eDNA surveys systematically underestimate the presence of annelids and reptiles in a given aquatic habitat?
7.Bloc 3 - Contextual ApplicationHard· Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)
How do recent advancements in digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) address the historical sensitivity limitations of eDNA when monitoring critically endangered, low-density species?
When integrating eDNA metabarcoding into regulatory environmental impact assessments, how does the current state of genetic reference databases limit reliable invertebrate identification?
9.Bloc 4 - Expert SynthesisExpert· Exponential Amplification Principle vs Sequential Detection Gate Model
How does the Exponential Amplification Principle's assumption of neutralized deposition differ from the Sequential Detection Gate Model's explanation of false negatives in eDNA surveys?
10.Bloc 4 - Expert SynthesisExpert· Differential Shedding Hypothesis vs Spatial Transport Model
When evaluating river biodiversity, which factor best distinguishes the false-negative risk of the Differential Shedding Hypothesis from the false-positive risk of the Spatial Transport Model?