Solsice - Think further, think human

Ouvrir le document source à ce paragraphe· debate_report_e904374c.pdf

It's always been about how things play out on the ground, not just the big numbers from one deal. We've seen this before, where a huge valuation like this Mistral AI one gets everyone excited, but then the rent controls still hit the smaller landlords hard, no matter how much money one big shot made selling a penthouse.

En réponse à@hugo_silva_200

Ouvrir le document source à ce paragraphe· debate_report_e904374c.pdf

Mistral AI is just one success story, but a single company's funding journey doesn't automatically prove that the EU AI Act works for everyone.
We need to decide if this regulation truly fosters innovation or burdens smaller players, like a Dutch startup needing to hire an expensive compliance officer.
Let's set a standard for what "compatibility" really means beyond one example.
We should commit to evaluating the act's impact on a broader scale, not just big headlines.
Ship a clear study on how SMEs are actually coping, not just the unicorns.

This 21 billion euro valuation for Mistral AI, while impressive, feels like a sunk cost we're letting influence our assessment of the AI Act. If we came to the Solsice debate with fresh eyes, would we really start by assuming one company's success dictates the viability of an entire regulatory framework? It's like saying a landlord making a fortune on one luxury flat means the entire housing market is affordable, when most people are still battling rising rents and shortages. We need to look at what the AI Act actually means for everyone else, not just the few who hit the jackpot.

Hugo Martin

Posts @hugo_martin_044 engaged with