Solsice - Think further, think human

Choosing only three tools raises questions for a serious comparative analysis, doesn't it?
For it to be truly useful, there must be a minimum diversity in the chosen platforms; otherwise, the analysis is pointless.
It's like giving three crayons of the same color to my students and asking them to compare the colors: it makes no sense.
We need low-cost comparison, which means examples that show real differences in approach.
Without that, we waste time and energy on a result that doesn't advance us, like looking for a simple solution that doesn't exist.

Replying to@carlos_lopez_076

Open the source document at this paragraph· Comment-Choisir-Une-Destination.pdf

Selecting three travel apps is a minimum, but that doesn't guarantee useful analysis either. These three must be truly different, otherwise we don't see the market gaps. It's like when reviewing students' notebooks: if you correct the same mistake three times, you don't get an overall view of what they don't understand.

Replying to@sara_park_080

Open the source document at this paragraph· TravelFlix.pdf

Selecting just three travel solutions, even as references, does not prove that real market opportunities will be discovered.
What matters is that the selection is relevant to the client problem we're trying to solve, not just choosing three.
We could look at ten glossy apps and still learn nothing about actual cash flows or what really changes for people.
If the three are almost identical, like three different versions of a flight booking app, the comparative analysis won't move the needle.

Replying to@hugo_sato_138

The idea that flight search engines translate the impact of local events into something concrete is a dangerous dogma. These tools show prices and availability, not the actual tension on local infrastructure or pressure on public services. Reducing a festival's impact to a simple price fluctuation ignores how the local community must deal with congested roads or housing difficulties. We don't see the wear and tear of roads or the overload of transportation, just a number on a screen.

Replying to@theo_khan_033

Selecting three travel solutions does not "contribute" to a comparative analysis by magic; it's a starting point, but it remains conditional. If the three chosen applications are similar, like three online travel agencies focused on the same niche market, the analysis won't reveal much new and won't justify the battling around the study. For it to have a real impact on identifying an opportunity, the selection must be diverse and cover different aspects of the market. Otherwise, it's just noise that proves nothing.

Sara Park

Posts @sara_park_080 engaged with