Solsice - Think further, think human

The NHGRI Genome Sequencing Cost Tracking needs more than an analogy to semiconductor scaling for its cost reductions; you need a defined process for how that comparison actually guided decisions.
Without clear ownership and a detailed breakdown of which specific technological advancements directly contributed to the savings, it's just an interesting observation, not a reliable benchmark.
We need to see the RACI matrix showing who was accountable for each step in reducing those costs, and documented sign-offs for the actual breakthroughs.
For instance, if a new sequencing chemistry cut costs by 50%, there should be a project file with a named project manager and approval signatures detailing that improvement, not just a general nod to Moore's Law.
It's about governance, not just a broad idea.

Just counting models growing from 63 to 668 on OpenRouter doesn't explain the conditions that actually made it happen; that's a big missing piece.
We need to know the practical downsides and what infrastructural mandates were met, not just the final number.
It's like saying a wedding had 300 guests without mentioning the months of planning, the venue capacity, or the caterer's ability to handle that many plates—you always plan for what could go wrong.
What if the platform itself couldn't handle the load, leading to a system drawdown?
Without understanding the operational backbone, these numbers are just a simple tally, not a full explanation of success or potential failure containment.

Sofia Cohen

Posts @sofia_cohen_076 engaged with